/5
Character Development 3
Editing 5
Sex 0
Violence 1
Romance 0
Readability/Flow 5
All right; the big question: Did Andrew Friedman pull it off? I'm going to give that a qualified yes.
Yes: The poetry is consistent. It rhymes and has good rhythm and flow and it tells the story. The story is fairly complex and I only got lost once. I misread a stanza and ended up with the wrong name for one of the characters which messed me up for a second. But a quick flip back solved my problem. This is nothing that I haven't had to do with conventional books so I don't count it as a negative.
Qualified: I didn't think the reason for the crime was dealt with well or completely explained. The motivation seemed contrived. The story itself was powerful and touched me. I was surprised at how completely I was drawn in. The style of poetry, though, contrasted in style to the solemnity of the story. The rhyme and the metre gave me a feeling of lightness while the subject matter was quite dark. This may not be a negative, however, as it gives the book a greater range of appeal. Readers who are not poetry aficionados will still find the story accessible and readable.
If you are looking for a quick read and an unconventional set up you could do a lot worse than 'Say Not What If'.
A Taste (pg 7):
But even then with that at hand
I still did not understand
I was blind and did not see
The harm I caused, the misery.
Poetry..yes no. Of course I like it, a few at a time, but when mixed with a book not so much
ReplyDeleteWhat a brave thing to do. Kudos for Mr. Friedman. Not really my thing but I am impressed at the thought of it.
ReplyDelete